Five Emerging Media Trends For The Next Five Years

The media landscape has changed more in the last 5 years than the previous 50.

Think back over what’s happened in just the second half of this decade.

  • At the beginning of 2004, Google was a privately owned company.  At the close of 2009, it is worth almost $200 billion.
  • Facebook, started in 2004, exploded from a geeky Harvard Web service into a massive avenue for real-time communication on which users spend 8 billion minutes a day.
  • Twitter, founded in 2006, has become a channel for 18 million active users to discover ideas, create content, and share both easily.
  • At the beginning of 2006, the average cell phone user made 198 calls per month and sent 65 text messages per month.  In 2008, it was 204 calls per month and 357 text messages per month.
  • Old media incumbents—including papers such as the Chicago Tribune, Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Los Angeles Times—have filed for bankruptcy.

Heading into the new decade, the velocity of information will increase further.  Interactivity is a table stake.  Engagement marketing is a prerequisite.  Customization is a given.

Companies will live or die by how well they adopt to a rapidly changing consumer.  And those who plan for the future are most likely to profit from it.  Here are my 5 predictions for what we’ll see in the next 5 years:

  • Empowered consumers will screen out advertising.  Advertisements have decreasing impact on consumers.  In July 2007, 32% of Internet users would click on a display ad in a given month.  In March 2009, only 16% of Internet users would click on an ad in a given month (ComScore).  Consumers will go beyond just ignoring advertisements though.  Widespread adoption of Caller ID, DVR or TiVo, and satellite radio have made “interruption marketing” increasingly difficult. 
  • Marketing services firms, media companies, and technology companies will converge.  In this last decade, a distinction remained between advertising and editorial content.  (Advertising funded editorial; supposedly a line existed between the two.)  In this next decade, those lines blur completely.  There are two new categories of content: content people want and content people don’t want.  The content they don’t want (“interruption”) will be screened out; the content they want (“permission”) will increasingly come over email, mobile, and Web. 
  • Media consumption will increase.  Time spent across all three screens—TV, computer, and mobile—has increased over the last ten years.  As automobile companies integrate media hardware into vehicles, consumers buy more smart phones, and hardware companies introduce new consumer devices, media consumption will become easier and easier.  Eventually, consumers will access media anytime, anywhere.  The barriers to creating media will also fall.  Digital video recorders, like the Flip, will upstream to YouTube wirelessly.  Every consumer will find it intuitive to create and share text, images, audio, and video—making  real-time interaction ubiquitous.
  • Social networks will increase in importance.  Facebook is where the Internet starts for most people.  Blogs are asynchronous, a reason blogging has never developed mass appeal.  Social networks are life in real time.  And it will only become more powerful as smart phone adoption increases, layering in location-based features to the existing real-time, two-way communication capabilities of social networks.
  • AppWorld will enable a new method of monetizing content.  Apple cracked the code, and convinced people to pay for music via iTunes.  Just as the iPod and iPhone transformed the way consumers purchase and experience music, eReaders will alter the way we consume images and text.  Always connected, portable eReaders make it possible to read a magazine on the beach—something few people are willing to do with their laptop. As eReaders such as Apple's long-awaited Tablet begin to incorporate applications, they will become a powerful new monetization tool for content publishers.

Filed under: , , , ,

Reader Comments

Comments are moderated. It may take some time for your comment to appear.

  1. Phil Michaelson

    December 31, 2009 11:06 AM | Permalink

    Great point about the rate of clicks on ads falling. I completely agree interruption based advertising is going to change dramatically.

    I'd add in Ring Tones to the discussion about what people are willing to pay for. People are willing to pay for time & place shifted media/software, particularly if the interface is allows for self service, anytime, anywhere, with a previously established payment account (e.g., Amazon, iTunes, Verizon),
  2. Marissa

    January 01, 2010 11:00 AM | Permalink

    Social networks Are a digital experience today...I'd add that over the next few years we will see a trend toward digital and "real life" converge. Your social network on facebook or a group you are a member of will be more integrated into live experinces...
    You ask your local neighborhood cooking network what's a popular dish people are making for dinner via twitter and then a few of you meet up and cook..togeather...
  3. Zach Clayton

    January 03, 2010 9:22 PM | Permalink

    Good point Phil. I think that ease of payment due to previously established payment account (e.g. iTunes or Verizon) has a big impact on consumer willingness to complete the sale.

    Marissa's comment about the convergence between real and digital life is really compelling too. A generation ago the geographic community really was the community, because you couldn't easily or cheaply communicate across distance. (Remember "long distance" calls?) Today, that has changed completely. I might have more in common with someone living in CA than next door to me in NC. And I can video chat over Skype with them. So, I think of the Internet as having enabled these communities of interest that aren't bounded by geography.

    However, the promise of mobile is that you've layered in geo. Now, you can have the best of both worlds -- coordinating people who are proximate along with staying in touch (in real time) with those who aren't. Across this progression technology is just becoming more and more integrated into our lives.
  4. Chris Sinclair

    January 06, 2010 9:23 AM | Permalink

    Zach,
    Online advertising will not be ignored in the same way TV ads will be by consumers. Online banner ads/ search and content are as much about building brand awareness (impressions) as they are about whether someone clicks on the ad. ComScore has good data to back this up.
  5. Zach Clayton

    January 07, 2010 9:43 PM | Permalink

    Chris, Thanks for the comment, and great to hear from you! I definitely think that there is value in brand building online. However, if the display advertising isn't relevant to the content I think it gets ignored.

    I recently attended a speech that Gian Fulgoni (Chairman of ComScore) gave. During the speech he showed data that click thru rates on online advertisements have dropped by half over the past three years. Consumers are simply increasingly better at screening out any true "interruption"--even online. Brand immersion will have impact, but only if it's structured so that's creating value for consumers.

    "Good" brand immersion: an IT company whose blog provides potential customers with advice on how to select a VOIP provider. This is an effective way to increase awareness.

    "Bad" brand immersion: a display ad for a new car that appears on the WRAL weather page. This is a poorly targeted, expensive way to reach people who are far away from the decision-making process on automobile purchase.

Leave a Comment